<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>The Word on Sustainable Word of Mouth Marketing - Latest Comments in Social Media Presence: The Sum Of Its Parts</title><link>http://wom.disqus.com/</link><description>The official blog for Zocalo Group, a word of mouth marketing agency</description><atom:link href="https://wom.disqus.com/social_media_presence_the_sum_of_its_parts/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Feb 2009 12:43:52 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Social Media Presence: The Sum Of Its Parts</title><link>http://blog.zocalogroup.com/2009/02/social-media-presence-the-sum.html#comment-6500950</link><description>&lt;p&gt;@Cece - Thanks for stopping by! ;)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I struggle with classifying a company distributing news, promotions, and perspectives as being a member of a 'conversation.'&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt; There is a lot of buzz about 'joining the conversation.' I think the response has been more of an expansion of previous one-way communication strategies into varied social media channels.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Sometimes I wonder if it takes some of the 'social' out of the medium.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Rasmussen</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 23 Feb 2009 12:43:52 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Social Media Presence: The Sum Of Its Parts</title><link>http://blog.zocalogroup.com/2009/02/social-media-presence-the-sum.html#comment-6467417</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi Ryan,&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I wanted to share my response to this quesiton here for your readers, with slight editing:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I would expect a different conversation from each group. Depending on what each said, I would want to interact with both. And in some cases, this can be the same in one. I believe that this applies to any company depending on the goals you’re seeking to achieve.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;With regard to what type of conversation I would expect with a company versus an individual, my response was:&lt;br&gt;I think the nature of “conversation” is different. I go to a corporate brand to hear about the company news, promotion and possibly their perspective on industry events, especially if I’m a customer, reporter, analyst, prospect and/or employee. As for an individual, the “conversation” may still cover these topics, but this puts a “personal” touch to my communication.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Thanks for continuing the conversation!&lt;br&gt;Cece&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Csalomonlee</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 21 Feb 2009 12:11:06 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>